Market (TAM) — tokenization / RWAs

We’re early in a multi‑trillion‑dollar shift: moving real assets on‑chain with compliant rails.

Tokenized digital securities: Citi GPS estimates ~$4–$5T by 2030 (mid‑range framing).
Broader asset tokenization: BCG‑linked estimates often cite ~$16T by 2030 (conservative case).
Our wedge: start with verifiable mining / AI‑compute infrastructure where cashflows can be measured and audited.

Third‑party market estimates (directional, not guarantees). Sources: Citi GPS (summary) · BCG/ADDX tokenization report.

Target returns (illustrative, not guaranteed)

Modeled annualized IRR (base case): ~94% / year (from the provided assumptions spreadsheet; highly sensitive to BTC price, network difficulty/hashprice, uptime, capex/opex, and execution).
Under the same base‑case assumptions, a 12% stake could map to ~$5.37M of value by 2031 (illustrative; also sensitive to reinvestment and dilution).

Illustrative projections only. Actual outcomes depend on market and operational variables (BTC price, network difficulty/hashprice, uptime, capex/opex, execution). We can share a bull/base/bear sensitivity view on request.

Roadmap (launchpad → Genesis Grid → STO)

Now: Launchpad MVP live (OGPool) + counsel‑ready structure
0–30 days after funding: electrical provider binding steps (deposit + execution), procurement kickoff
30–100 days: 2MW deployment + dashboard/reporting cadence live
100–180 days: scale toward 6MW + prepare STO track (data room, KPI history, audits as needed)
STO readiness: issuance follows proof + regulatory approvals (milestone‑based)

Inbound STO interest (indicative)

A datacenter‑focused fund has expressed interest in participating in the STO track, with up to $8M earmarked (non‑binding; subject to diligence, structure, and approvals).
Sequencing: execute Genesis Grid + reporting first, then proceed with STO issuance milestones.

We can share details under NDA.

The wedge

Mining exposure is capital‑intensive and often opaque. Genesis Grid makes it verifiable and repeatable.

Infrastructure execution: power, interconnect, site build, commissioning
Verification layer: production + treasury visibility, uptime, reporting pack
Launchpad: tokenization + issuance rails once operations + data are proven

Power & interconnect

Target tariff: $0.056/kWh (5‑year term)
Guarantee deposit: $94k
Feasibility path includes an exclusive 23kV feeder (per electrical provider feasibility docs)

Feasibility ≠ executed contract. This raise funds the binding steps and delivery milestones.

Launchpad architecture (MVP — live today)

HFSP’s launchpad starts with verifiability: data → proof → reporting. The MVP is live. Demo available on request.

Data layer: miners/pool feeds + meter inputs → normalized events
Proof layer: signed snapshots + treasury address attestations
Reporting layer: KPI dashboard + monthly investor pack
Issuance layer (roadmap): STO‑ready structure once cashflows are proven

Tokenization structure (today → roadmap)

Today: operating company equity raise (this round) + verifiable reporting
Today: counsel‑ready tokenization structure drafted (execution follows proof + milestones)
Near‑term: data room + KPI cadence to support structured products
Roadmap: tokenized/regulated issuance referencing verified production (no guaranteed yield language)

Milestone‑based: structure follows proof. We only “turn on” issuance after operations + reporting are live.

What’s real today

Genesis Grid power/interconnect feasibility documentation supporting up to ~6,000 kW reserved and the interconnect path
CAPEX plan for initial scope totals ~$839,590
Staged rollout plan: 2MW first, then scale toward 6MW
Launchpad MVP is live (data → proof → reporting). Demo available on request.

100‑day execution plan (milestones)

Day 0–30

Deposits + binding steps, engineering approvals, procurement kickoff

Day 30–70

Site + electrical build, line works, equipment install

Day 70–100

Commissioning, bring 2MW online, dashboard live + first reporting cycle